Research v. Education v. Reporting

Vs Entertainment

When I started creating online, I always wondered what it means, to write words out of thin air. When you look at the internet, even the supposedly front pages (old.reddit.com, consumer reports, forums, youtube, twitter/X, nostr / stacker.news etc) and search engines, spam is omnipotent. AI is fixing some spam issues but marketers, as always will find new ways to control the narrative.

I have been thinking of what post-AI content will look like, and imo AI will replace search & entry lvl coding. AI agents will create new IDE's and interfaces (to reallity itself).

AI will kill most “SEO” - content which is spam (i.e. strongarm marketers into thinking more), as in, what would have been a sentence rather than a Table of Contents, will be a sentence.

If you want a recipie, you will get one! not long ass articles with SEO slop. (think based.cooking like answers)

I think its important look at content through thre lens of research, reporting (journalism) & education.

Research is synthesis of new information, new insights, new lines that connects the dots, and shows you new ways that previously didn't existed.

https://medium.com/future-literacy/zeroth-principles-thinking-9376d0b7e7f5

Indoctrinization is NOT education (DM bowtiedqueenbee on X, she will tell you), its opening up the minds of the educatee, challenging their axioms and revealing the underlining assumptions and “myth” busting to create better maps of the world so that they take better actions.

Reporting vis-a-vis journalism is narrative building, getting a crowd on the same page to do awesome stuff ideally. (imo good marketers don't create mobs but cults)

Narrative building is selling the discovery of the inventions.

I educate through my research. I don't do reporting. If my work interests you, it entertains you.

A researcher brings new information, an educator imparts it, a reporter contextalizes it.

Truth, Wisdom & Tech Savviness

Securitybrahh | The Sovereign Shadow

Further reading